ç Knight's Tour Notes Index
Including 'TwoKnight' and 'FourKnight' Magic Tours
Sections on this page:
— Introduction
— Alternating Knight and Rook Moves
— Emperor Magic Tours on Small Boards
— TwoKnight Magic Tours 8×8
— TwoKnight Diagonally Magic Tours 8×8
— FourKnight Magic Tours 8×8
— A FourKnight Diagonally Magic Tour 8×8
Introduction
A piece that can move either as knight or rook is known as an Empress, and a combination of knight and wazir (i.e. singlestep rook) is
an Emperor. Tours by either of these pieces, i.e. using both knight and rook moves, can thus be termed Imperial.
A class of imperial tours that has received intensive study on the 8×8 board are those that use only a small number of rook moves, connected
by chains of knight moves all of the same number of moves. In particular magic tours are easily constructed with two or four rook moves, all the others
being knight moves. These are also known, perhaps misleadingly, as TwoKnight Tours and FourKnight Tours. Some results of this type were
collected by H. J. R. Murray and are included in his manuscripts (1942 chapter XIV) and (1951 chapter X). He wrote that: "The problem was popular with
French composers between 1880 and 1914 when nearly 300 twochain magic tours were published in the Paris chess columns." It seems he was unaware of
earlier work by "E.H." published in the Glasgow Weekly Herald from 1873 onwards. I was able to consult the 18734 volume at the British Library
Newspaper depository at Colindale on 25 October 1996 and include some results of this, but further work needs to be done in checking these sources.
It is of course possible to construct TwoKnight and FourKnight tours that are not imperial tours, since moves other than rook moves may connect
the ends of the knight paths. The connecting moves can, indeed, themselves be knight moves: this is the case in two of the magic tours by Jaenisch,
which he described as 'doubly reentrant' since 1 linked with 32 as well as 64, and 33 linked with 64 as well as 32.
Alternating wazir and knight tours interested Indian composers. Here is an example from Harikrishna 1871, two from Naidu 1922 and
a symmetric tour of my own (Jelliss 1984).
In the first online issue of the Games and Puzzles Journal #19 published in 2001 I wrote: The following note was sent by Professor Donald E. Knuth
of Stanford University (dated 16 Sep 2000): I ran across a curious thing in The Strand Magazine volume 36 (1908), contributed by "Mr J.Wallis,
51, Holsworthy Square, Gray's Inn Road, W.C.": He constructed a tour of the chessboard in which knight's moves alternate with rook moves, and the square
is also magic [i.e. adds to the same sum, 260, in each rank, each file and the two main diagonals]. This was on page 480 of the American edition,
probably in the same place of the London edition since each number had 120 pages that year. ... So I have two questions: (1) Have you ever heard of this
"J.Wallis" before? (2) Have you ever heard of such alternating tours before? [Wallis also presented one for knight and bishop, but not magic, on page 360.]
12  55  54  9  8  59  58  5 
53  10  11  56  57  6  7  60 
13  50  51  16  1  62  63  4 
52  15  14  49  64  3  2  61 
20  47  46  17  32  35  34  29 
45  18  19  48  33  30  31  36 
21  42  43  24  25  38  39  28 
44  23  22  41  40  27  26  37 


12  54  55  9  8  58  59  5 
13  51  50  16  1  63  62  4 
53  11  10  56  57  7  6  60 
52  14  15  49  64  2  3  61 
20  46  47  17  32  34  35  29 
21  43  42  24  25  39  38  28 
45  19  18  48  33  31  30  36 
44  22  23  41  40  26  27  37 

In my response I wrote with an account of other alternating tours dating back to AsSuli (see the pages on King and Multileaper Tours). I was unable to
find out any more about J. Wallis. but noted that by simple transformations Wallis's tour can be converted into other alternating tours similarly magic,
including this Empress tour, formed by interchanging the 23 and 67 ranks and files. (For the other two see the section on Queen tours). Some moves have
to be shown by curved lines for clarity.
Among the elementary theory of magic tours will be found three magic emperor tours on the 2×4 board.
There are eleven on the 2×8 board. (I showed these in Chessics #26, Summer 1986, the special issue on magic tours.)
There is a unique diagonally magic Emperor tour on the 4×4 board; in fact it is the only such magic tour that uses only two types of move.
(See the section on Multileapers for more details.) It is worth a separate diagram. (This was also in Chessics 26.)
01 08 09 16
14 13 04 03
07 02 15 10
12 11 06 05


Since the moves of the emperor always take it to a cell of opposite colour to that on which it
stands, the results of the theorems, regarding magic knight tours on even sided boards apply to it. The question of the possibility or not of magic
knight's tours on rectangles 4m by 4n + 2, led me to consider emperor tours on such boards. As expected, they are possible. Examples follow.
They were first published in The Games and Puzzles Journal #26 MarchApril 2003.
The following two are the only twoknight emperor magic tours on the 4×6 board. The magic constants are 50 and 75. These tours can be renumbered
cyclically from the halfway point (i.e. 1213 becomes 241 and vice versa) and remain magic but are then empress tours since the 1213 rookmove link
is a threecell move.
14 7 22 3 18 11
23 4 13 12 21 2
8 15 6 19 10 17
5 24 9 16 1 20

23 4 13 12 21 2
14 7 22 3 18 11
5 24 9 16 1 20
8 15 6 19 10 17



Here are examples 8 by 6. The first was consciously constructed using ‘contiguous
contraparallel chains’, but the others were constructed for their visual symmetry.
In the first tour if the ranks are divided into three pairs then all these pairs
add to 49 (rank total therefore 3×49 = 147. In the files pairs related by
reflection in the horizontal median add to 25 or 73 which together equal 98
(twice 49) thus ensuring the file sum is 4×49 = 196. This is the same in the
second tour, but in the third tour the constants in the files are 37 and 61.
34 15 46 3 32 17
47 2 33 16 5 44
14 35 4 45 18 31
1 48 13 36 43 6
24 25 12 37 30 19
11 38 21 28 7 42
26 23 40 9 20 29
39 10 27 22 41 8


15 32 45 4 17 34
44 3 16 33 46 5
31 14 1 48 35 18
2 43 36 13 6 47
23 30 37 12 19 26
42 11 24 25 38 7
29 22 9 40 27 20
10 41 28 21 8 39


42 5 36 13 44 7
35 22 43 6 27 14
4 41 12 37 8 45
21 34 23 26 15 28
40 3 38 11 46 9
33 20 25 24 29 16
2 39 18 31 10 47
19 32 1 48 17 30


The same plan as in the first 8×6 tour above can be extended to any boards 8×2n (with n >2). See section 6 below for an 8×8 example.
Here is an 8×10 example: the horizontal pairs all add to 81 and the vertical pairs add to 41 and 121 giving the magic constants:
row sum R = 5×81 = 405 and file sum S = 4×81 = 324.
58 23 78 3 26 55 74 7 28 53
79 2 57 24 75 6 27 54 73 8
22 59 4 77 56 25 10 71 52 29
1 80 21 60 5 76 51 30 9 72
40 41 20 61 36 45 70 11 32 49
19 62 37 44 65 16 31 50 69 12
42 39 64 17 46 35 14 67 48 33
63 18 43 38 15 66 47 34 13 68


The results in this section and the next are from the H. J. R. Murray manuscripts and the "E.H." articles on "Knightly Peripatetics" in the
Glasgow Weekly Herald mentioned in the Introduction. The totals for numbers of tours given by Murray differ in the two versions.
The number of 32pt chains connecting f7 and c2 as counted by de Hijo is 378, but not all of these give magic tours. Murray mentions totals of
around 290 geometrical tours in direct quaternary symmetry based on the work of Ligondes. He expresses the view that, apart from the diagonally
magic tours shown in the next section, the twochain tours which are magic are not particularly interesting.
In our diagrams of twoknight tours the coloured cells highlight the eight numbers 1, 16, 17, 32, 33, 48, 49, 64 that mark the ends of the four
quarters of the tour. In twoknight tours the links 1617 and 4849 are knight moves. To assist in recognition of tours, the conventions are observed
that we number the tour in such a way that the 3233 move is as short as possible, that the principal diagonal consists of even numbers, and the cell
numbered 01 is on the left side of the board. (This has meant many changes from the arrangements shown in the source articles.)
We begin with six examples from Murray's two manuscripts; comments in quotes are his. The first example derives from Vandermonde's method of
constructing twoknights' tours, which "serves with little modification for the construction of twochain magic tours on the chessboard. Indeed, if
Vandermonde had used an arithmetical notation instead of a geometrical diagram, and had happened to adopt the right cell for his starting point,
his twoknights' tour would have been magic." (The diagonals add to 248 and 272). The second diagram shows a solution with the linkage cells all
in the central 2×4 area (diagonal sums 240, 280).
34  37  64  23  58  17  12  15 
63  24  35  38  11  14  57  18 
36  33  22  61  20  59  16  13 
25  62  39  44  05  10  19  56 
40  03  26  21  60  55  46  09 
29  32  43  04  45  06  49  52 
02  41  30  27  54  51  08  47 
31  28  01  42  07  48  53  50 


30  41  18  39  10  63  08  51 
19  38  31  42  07  50  11  62 
44  29  40  17  64  09  52  05 
37  20  43  32  49  06  61  12 
28  45  22  33  16  59  04  53 
21  36  25  48  01  56  13  60 
46  27  34  23  58  15  54  03 
35  24  47  26  55  02  57  14 


"The simplest type of these tours is one in which the two chains are in direct quaternary symmetry. The necessary and sufficient condition for equality
of row and column sums is that every column or every row shall contain two numbers not greater than 16." [In other words the path 1 to 16 must form a
"bisatin".] Murray gives these two examples, formed from the same geometrical chain. [Their diagonal sums are 220, 200 and 336, 184.]
06  31  02  55  10  63  34  59 
01  54  07  62  03  58  11  64 
30  05  32  09  56  33  60  35 
53  08  29  04  61  36  57  12 
28  41  52  45  20  13  24  37 
51  44  49  40  25  16  21  14 
48  27  42  19  46  23  38  17 
43  50  47  26  39  18  15  22 


02  27  30  43  06  51  54  47 
29  42  03  50  31  46  07  52 
26  01  28  05  44  53  48  55 
41  04  25  32  49  56  45  08 
24  61  40  33  16  09  20  57 
39  64  37  60  21  12  17  10 
36  23  62  15  34  19  58  13 
63  38  35  22  59  14  11  18 

"It is clear that this method of construction entails certain numerical properties. (1) Diametrally opposite cells differ by 16. (2) If m, a number not
greater than 16, stands on cell A, and A' is its reflection in the vertical median, A'' the diametrally opposite cell, and A''' its reflection in the
horiziontal median (so that the four cells are in direct quaternary symmetry), then the numbers on these four cells are: m, 65 − m, 16 + m,
49 − m, and the sum of these four numbers is 130. (3) The 16 cells of the two diagonals fall into four sets of four cells in direct quaternary
symmetry, so the total of the two diagonals is always 520. (4) In every column two cells similarly situated with respect to the horizontal median sum
either to 49 or to 81. Two pairs are 49 and two 81."
"If one diagonal sum is 260 + x, the other is 260 – x. Four numbers not greater than 16 must lie on the diagonals, and if the diagonal sums
are to be equal two of these numbers must lie on each diagonal. Suppose a and b lie on one diagonal and c and d on the other diagonal, with a < b,
a < c, and c < d. Then the diagonal sums are 260 + 2(a + b – c – d) and 260 + 2(c + d – a – b). If these are equal then
a + b = c + d. It follows that in ascending order of magnitude they are a, c, d, b." This allows a, c, d, b to be any of 68 cases.
Murray lists 14 cases, without indicating why other cases are omitted:
1, 4, 6, 9; 1, 4, 8, 11; 1, 4, 10, 13; 1, 4, 12, 15; 1, 6, 10, 15; 2, 5, 7, 10; 2, 5, 9, 12;
2, 5, 11, 14; 2, 7, 9, 14; 3, 6, 8, 11; 3, 6, 10, 13; 3, 6, 12, 15; 4, 7, 9, 12; 7, 10, 12, 15.
"If instead of repeating the 16pt chain f7c2 from c2f7 we can find a different 16pt chain f7c2 which uses the same cells as the first
chain, and use it to complete the closed 32pt chain f7f7, we may obtain a twoknights' magic tour in binary symmetry. I have found 34 geometrical tours
in this way which yield 56 (or counting reversals of numbering 112) magic twoknights' tours. These however are not the only ways of obtaining these tours,
as may be seen from the following solutions." [The first is by Lehmann (311, 1932), the second by Murray 1951 is asymmetrically linked.]
62  51  14  03  60  53  10  07 
15  02  61  52  09  06  59  56 
50  63  04  13  54  57  08  11 
01  16  49  64  05  12  55  58 
48  33  32  17  44  37  26  23 
31  18  45  36  27  24  41  38 
34  47  20  29  40  43  22  25 
19  30  35  46  21  28  39  42 


42  03  22  31  50  59  46  07 
23  32  43  04  45  06  49  58 
02  41  30  21  60  51  08  47 
29  24  01  44  05  48  57  52 
40  33  28  61  20  53  16  09 
25  62  37  34  15  12  19  56 
36  39  64  27  54  17  10  13 
63  26  35  38  11  14  55  18 


The following six examples are from the "Knightly Peripatetics" in the Glasgow Weekly Herald 18734.
The tours were set as problems, and the solution was published a week or two later, hence the two dates.
Geometrical diagrams are omitted for the rest of this section but may be added at a later date if thought useful.
VII April 12  May 3, 1873 (diagonals 240, 280). IX May 24  31, 1873 (diagonals 256, 264). X June 14  21, 1873 (diagonals 288, 232).
46  15  54  21  44  11  50  19 
55  22  45  16  49  20  43  10 
14  47  24  53  12  41  18  51 
23  56  13  48  17  52  09  42 
58  25  36  01  64  29  40  07 
35  02  57  28  37  08  63  30 
26  59  04  33  32  61  06  39 
03  34  27  60  05  38  31  62 

34  01  62  31  60  55  10  07 
63  30  33  04  09  06  59  56 
02  35  32  61  54  57  08  11 
29  64  03  36  05  12  53  58 
42  37  28  21  52  19  48  13 
27  24  41  38  45  16  51  18 
40  43  22  25  20  49  14  47 
23  26  39  44  15  46  17  50 

54  51  42  03  62  23  14  11 
43  02  55  52  13  10  63  22 
50  53  04  41  24  61  12  15 
01  44  49  56  09  16  21  64 
48  05  32  25  40  33  60  17 
31  28  45  08  57  20  37  34 
06  47  26  29  36  39  18  59 
27  30  07  46  19  58  35  38 

XIII Aug 16  30, 1873 (diagonals 288, 232). XVI Sept 20  Oct 4, 1873 (diagonals 356, 164). XXIV Dec 20 1873  Jan 3 1874 (diagonals 264, 256).
56  53  48  07  58  17  12  09 
47  06  57  54  11  08  59  18 
52  55  04  49  16  61  10  13 
05  46  51  34  31  14  19  60 
44  03  30  15  50  35  62  21 
29  26  45  32  33  20  39  36 
02  43  24  27  38  41  22  63 
25  28  01  42  23  64  37  40 

64  43  08  53  28  41  06  17 
09  30  63  42  07  18  51  40 
44  33  54  29  52  27  16  05 
31  10  45  62  19  04  39  50 
34  55  20  03  46  61  26  15 
21  32  11  36  13  38  49  60 
56  35  02  23  58  47  14  25 
01  22  57  12  37  24  59  48 

06  63  30  41  08  51  18  43 
31  40  07  62  19  42  09  50 
64  05  38  29  52  11  44  17 
39  32  61  12  37  20  49  10 
26  33  04  53  28  45  16  55 
01  60  27  36  13  54  21  48 
34  25  58  03  46  23  56  15 
59  02  35  24  57  14  47  22 

According to H. J. R. Murray's account: "We find 15 tours, arithmetically different, which are [diagonally] magic squares. Twelve geometrical diagrams
give 15 magic squares. The first three (ABC) are generated by paths without selfintersection [as also are G and H]. Tours D and E are formed from the same
pattern of circuits, numbered from a different origin. Tour F has eight twounit lines. Tours GH, IJ and KL are pairs with similar central patterns, and
I is similar to C. The last three (MNO) are related in that the circuits used in M and N use the same cells, and the tour in O is formed by using one pair
of circuits from M and the other pair from N; as a result the pattern of the circuits in this case shows only binary and not quaternary symmetry."
At least five of these tours also appear in the Glasgow Weekly Herald articles by "E.H." on "Knightly Peripatetics". A is XII (July 19  Aug 2 1873),
G is XXV (Jan 10  24 1874), H is XXI (Oct 18  Nov 1 1873), J is XXVI (Feb 7  21 1874), K is XXII (Nov 8  27 1873). There may be more in issues I've not
seen. The tour M is quoted in Rouse Ball and Coxeter (1956) as by A. Rilly.
02  25  58  35  14  23  56  47 
59  36  03  24  57  46  13  22 
26  01  60  15  34  21  48  55 
37  04  27  32  49  54  45  12 
28  61  38  33  16  11  20  53 
39  64  05  50  31  44  17  10 
06  29  62  41  08  19  52  43 
63  40  07  30  51  42  09  18 

02  25  54  45  04  27  56  47 
53  44  03  26  55  46  05  28 
24  01  52  15  34  29  48  57 
43  14  23  32  49  58  35  06 
22  51  42  33  16  07  30  59 
41  64  13  50  31  36  17  08 
12  21  62  39  10  19  60  37 
63  40  11  20  61  38  09  18 

34  21  64  13  36  17  60  15 
63  12  35  20  61  14  37  18 
22  33  62  09  40  19  16  59 
11  42  55  24  57  26  07  38 
54  23  10  41  08  39  58  27 
43  32  03  56  25  46  49  06 
02  53  30  45  04  51  28  47 
31  44  01  52  29  48  05  50 

60  51  12  03  62  53  14  05 
11  02  61  52  13  04  63  54 
50  59  10  41  24  55  06  15 
01  40  49  58  07  16  25  64 
48  09  32  23  42  33  56  17 
31  22  39  08  57  26  43  34 
38  47  20  29  36  45  18  27 
21  30  37  46  19  28  35  44 

38  61  18  09  40  63  20  11 
17  08  39  62  19  10  41  64 
60  37  16  51  30  33  12  21 
07  50  59  36  13  22  31  42 
58  15  06  29  52  43  34  23 
05  28  49  14  35  32  53  44 
48  57  26  03  46  55  24  01 
27  04  47  56  25  02  45  54 

38  47  40  29  36  25  18  27 
21  30  37  46  19  28  35  44 
48  39  20  41  24  45  26  17 
31  22  49  58  07  16  43  34 
50  59  32  23  42  33  06  15 
01  10  61  08  57  04  55  64 
60  51  12  03  62  53  14  05 
11  02  09  52  13  56  63  54 

02  25  54  45  04  27  56  47 
43  52  03  26  55  46  29  06 
24  01  44  53  28  05  48  57 
51  42  15  32  49  34  07  30 
14  23  50  33  16  31  58  35 
41  64  21  12  37  60  17  08 
22  13  62  39  10  19  36  59 
63  40  11  20  61  38  09  18 

02  25  54  45  04  27  56  47 
53  44  03  26  55  46  05  28 
24  01  52  43  06  29  48  57 
51  42  15  32  49  34  07  30 
14  23  50  33  16  31  58  35 
41  64  13  22  59  36  17  08 
12  21  62  39  10  19  60  37 
63  40  11  20  61  38  09  18 

02  35  32  61  04  33  30  63 
57  60  03  34  31  62  05  08 
36  01  58  11  54  07  64  29 
59  56  37  26  39  28  09  06 
22  25  12  55  10  53  40  43 
13  48  23  38  27  42  17  52 
24  21  46  15  50  19  44  41 
47  14  49  20  45  16  51  18 

34  57  64  13  36  17  24  15 
11  62  35  58  23  14  19  38 
56  33  12  63  18  37  16  25 
61  10  05  22  59  44  39  20 
04  55  60  43  06  21  26  45 
09  32  53  02  47  28  49  40 
54  03  30  07  42  51  46  27 
31  08  01  52  29  48  41  50 

42  29  04  27  54  45  52  07 
03  26  43  30  51  06  55  46 
64  41  28  05  44  53  08  17 
25  02  33  50  31  16  47  56 
40  63  32  15  34  49  18  09 
01  24  37  60  21  12  57  48 
62  39  22  35  14  59  10  19 
23  36  61  38  11  20  13  58 

12  47  14  55  10  51  18  53 
59  56  11  46  19  54  09  06 
48  13  58  15  50  07  52  17 
57  60  49  20  45  16  05  08 
24  21  32  61  04  33  44  41 
01  36  23  34  31  42  29  64 
22  25  38  03  62  27  40  43 
37  02  35  26  39  30  63  28 

34  61  64  13  36  17  20  15 
63  12  35  60  21  14  37  18 
56  33  62  07  42  19  16  25 
11  08  55  22  59  26  41  38 
54  57  10  43  06  39  24  27 
09  32  03  58  23  46  49  40 
02  53  30  05  44  51  28  47 
31  04  01  52  29  48  45  50 

34  57  64  13  36  17  24  15 
63  12  35  58  23  14  37  18 
56  33  62  05  44  19  16  25 
11  04  55  22  59  26  45  38 
54  61  10  43  06  39  20  27 
09  32  03  60  21  46  49  40 
02  53  30  07  42  51  28  47 
31  08  01  52  29  48  41  50 

34  57  64  13  36  17  24  15 
63  12  35  58  23  14  37  18 
56  33  62  07  42  19  16  25 
11  08  55  22  59  26  41  38 
54  61  10  43  06  39  20  27 
09  32  03  60  21  46  49  40 
02  53  30  05  44  51  28  47 
31  04  01  52  29  48  45  50 

These take the form of four knight paths, each of 15 moves, connected by four rook moves (or by three if the closure move connecting 1 to 64 is omitted).
The results here are my own work. They were first published in The Games and Puzzles Journal #26
MarchApril 2003 together with the results on rectangles given in section 3 above.
The first tour below was found as an offshoot from a study of maximum number of 3move knightlines in tours of squares and diamonds type. The squares
and diamonds are joined to make 12 threeunit lines, thus forming four knightpaths. When the ends of the knight paths are joined by wazir moves this gives
a magic emperor (wazir + knight) tour. (Not diagonally magic: DO = 288, DE = 240.)
The second tour was formed after a study of the structure of the first magic knight tour published by William Beverley in 1848. The righthand half of
his tour is symmetrical (with horizontal axis). My idea was that perhaps Beverley started from a biaxially symmetric pattern (the H ‘crosspatch’
pattern) and fiddled around with the lefthand side until he found the solution using what we now call ‘Beverley quartes’. My tour replaces the
four knight moves in the braid on c3d3c6d6 by four wazir links. The result is a magic emperor tour whose righthand side is the same as the Beverley tour,
both arithmetically and geometrically. (DO = 240, DE = 280, adding to 520, twice the magic constant.)
6 27 64 33 32 1 38 59
63 34 5 28 37 60 31 2
26 7 36 61 4 29 58 39
35 62 25 8 57 40 3 30
14 19 56 41 24 9 46 51
55 42 13 20 45 52 23 10
18 15 44 53 12 21 50 47
43 54 17 16 49 48 11 22


 
3 30 45 52 5 28 43 54
46 51 4 29 44 53 6 27
31 2 49 48 25 8 55 42
50 47 32 1 56 41 26 7
15 18 33 64 9 24 39 58
34 63 16 17 40 57 10 23
19 14 61 36 21 12 59 38
62 35 20 13 60 37 22 11



There is no proof that Beverley found his tour by this method. Another, equally possible method based on ‘Contiguous Contraparallel Chains’
was described by H. J. R. Murray. Alternatively it may be that Beverley found his tour by some sort of search method, since his is the first of the
regular tours to be encountered when they are arranged in sequence according to the Frénicle method for magic squares (i.e. oriented with the
smallest number at the top left corner and the number to its right less than the number below it).
A similar magic empress (rook + knight) tour is possible by connecting d4c4, d5c5, c3c6, d3d6 (see diagram below). The righthand side of this
has the same geometrical form as the Beverley tour, but not the same arithmetical form. (The numbers on the diagonals are the same as for the previous
tour, but permuted.)
The next diagram shows that the same plan as for the first 8×6 tour above works on the 8×8 board, the righthand side being geometrically
like the Beverley tour, but not arithmetically. The horizontal pairs all add to 65, and the vertical pairs to 97 and 33 which together equal 130.
(The diagonal sums are DO = 360, DE = 288).
51 46 29 4 53 44 27 6
30 3 52 45 28 5 54 43
47 50 1 32 41 56 7 26
2 31 48 49 8 25 42 55
63 34 17 16 57 40 23 10
18 15 64 33 24 9 58 39
35 62 13 20 37 60 11 22
14 19 36 61 12 21 38 59


 
46 19 62 3 44 21 6 59
63 2 45 20 5 60 43 22
18 47 4 61 24 41 58 7
1 64 17 48 57 8 23 42
32 33 16 49 40 25 10 55
15 50 29 36 9 56 39 26
34 31 52 13 28 37 54 11
51 14 35 30 53 12 27 38



The following is the text of an article I published in The Problemist July 1986 (p.196).
A Unique Magic Tour. In 1882 the Abbé Jolivald (alias "Paul de Hijo") published an enumeration of all the ways of covering the chessboard
with four 16move knight paths in rotary or reflective symmetry. T. W. Marlow has recently (Chessics 24, p.92) corrected his count for the
reflective case, finding 368 instead of 301.* If one move in the same relative position in each quarter is deleted the ends can be reconnected to form
Empress or Emperor tours. For these imperial tours to be magic in ranks and files, when numbered from the start of a quarter, each quarter must occupy
2 squares in each rank (or 2 in each file). Of the 368 cases, only 30 fulfil this condition. Of the 61 Emperor tours derived from these 30 cases, only
one also adds up to the magic constant (260) in the diagonals as well as the ranks and files. This unique case is illustrated.
It happens that the curiously shaped 16move knight circuit is one of the 7 that have no selfintersection.
42  03  28  53  44  05  30  55 
27  46  43  04  29  54  51  06 
02  41  26  45  52  07  56  31 
25  64  47  16  17  50  33  08 
40  01  18  49  48  15  32  57 
63  24  39  20  13  58  09  34 
38  19  22  61  36  11  14  59 
23  62  37  12  21  60  35  10 


* Examination of the de Hijo work shows that all the paths were listed, but there was an error in the statement of the total.